The primary economic mechanism of the bill authorizes the president to impose tariffs as high as 100% on the top five importers of Russian oil and gas. While the legislation targets Russia’s energy sector to undermine the economy amid its war in Ukraine, the tariff provision exposes major U.S. allies and trading partners to significant commercial risk. Potential targets include the European Union, South Korea, Japan, China, and India, depending on their import volumes of Russian energy.
The expansion of tariff powers follows a series of legal setbacks for the administration’s existing trade strategy. In February, the Supreme Court ruled that the president could not use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs, upholding lower-court decisions. In response, the administration pivoted to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose temporary 10% tariffs, and later invoked Section 301 of the same law to apply levies ranging from 10% to 12.5% on 60 trading partners. These existing duties, which are based on accusations of forced labor, are expected to face further legal challenges. In contrast, the new tariffs under the Russia sanctions bill may avoid similar litigation because the law provides broader, more open-ended authority.
Controversy Over Lack of Clarity
The bill’s passage was not unanimous, with Senators Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., attempting to remove the tariff authority clause without success. Critics argue that the legislation lacks specific criteria for determining which countries qualify as the top five importers of Russian energy, creating ambiguity that could be exploited.
Photo by Oleksiy Yeshtokyn,🌻🇺🇦🌻 / Pexels
“It will not bring peace to Ukraine, but rather will deliberately make American families poorer by increasing tariffs, which are nothing but a tax on imported goods,” Senator Paul said on the Senate floor.
Senator Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., also expressed unease about granting sweeping new tariff powers. He voted for the bill only after receiving a written promise from U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer that tariffs would be lifted once countries are no longer deemed top buyers of Russian energy or facilitators of sanctions evasion. However, Warnock cautioned that if the president oversteps this authority, judicial review may be necessary.
“We should not have to choose between putting a check on Putin’s aggression and putting a check on this president’s tariffs regime,” Warnock said.
Photo by Werner Pfennig / Pexels
Legal scholars have highlighted the structural weaknesses of the bill. Clark Packard and Scott Lincicome of the Cato Institute noted that the legislation does not specify what data will determine the ranking of the five largest importers. Additionally, while the tariff authority granted to the president expires in five years, the bill does not explicitly state how long any imposed tariffs will remain in effect.
The bill also includes direct sanctions on Russian President Vladimir Putin and senior Kremlin officials, alongside measures targeting the country’s energy infrastructure. The finalization of the law will depend on House approval and the president’s signature, after which the administration could begin the process of identifying and designating the specific nations subject to the new tariff regimes.
John Harris covers the economy with a focus on trade, financial policy, inflation, markets, and major business developments. He follows economic data, government decisions, central-bank developments, and changes in international commerce. John aims to explain what the numbers show while avoiding unnecessary speculation, giving readers a practical view of wider economic conditions.
