The NBI invited Duterte following Gracioso’s allegations that he delivered suitcases of cash to her and other members of the Duterte family while serving as a security aide to former House Speaker Lord Allan Velasco. In a press briefing on Tuesday, Duterte read out her affidavit, denying that she received any such payments. She characterized Gracioso’s claims as motivated by financial gain and personal resentment toward Velasco and his family. Duterte further stated that the NBI should consider filing a perjury case against Gracioso if the investigation concludes that his allegations are false.
The decision to submit the affidavit in lieu of an in-person appearance followed a formal legal request made by Duterte’s lawyers. In a letter dated October 1, Chua Lim & Associates informed NBI Director Melvin A. Matibag that the bureau’s September 30 invitation did not include the attached copy of Gracioso’s sworn statement, or Sinumpaang Salaysay, despite being referenced in the correspondence. The defense argued that the absence of this primary document prevented the Vice President from providing a meaningful reply at that time. Consequently, the legal team requested a clear and faithful copy of the affidavit, along with its attachments and any supporting evidence, to properly assess the allegations.
NBI Director Melvin Matibag has indicated that the bureau is currently examining Gracioso’s claims and the materials he submitted. He noted that photographs and other evidence are undergoing authentication and verification processes. Matibag also clarified that the invitations issued to individuals named in the affidavit, including Duterte, Davao City Representative Paolo Duterte, Velasco, and Velasco’s wife, are not subpoenas. The bureau is seeking statements from these individuals to clarify the issues under investigation. Gracioso has undergone lie detector examinations, although the NBI noted that an earlier test focused on his identity and relationships with the named individuals rather than the specific allegations in his affidavit.
Velasco’s camp has publicly rejected the accusations, describing them as “fabricated attacks” with no basis. They characterized the narrative as inconsistent and tailored in a “one-size-fits-all” manner. In related developments, the Bureau of Immigration confirmed that Velasco is currently outside the country, noting that he does not have a derogatory record that would prevent his departure. The NBI investigation remains ongoing, with the focus now on reviewing the submitted affidavit and the subsequent verification of evidence.
The legal proceedings highlight the procedural rights of high-ranking officials when summoned by investigative bodies. By submitting the affidavit through counsel, Duterte’s team has engaged with the investigation while maintaining a formal record of their defense against the specific allegations of illicit cash transfers. The next step in the process involves the NBI’s completion of its verification of evidence and the determination of whether further action, such as perjury charges against the complainant or continued inquiry into the recipients of the alleged funds, is warranted.
